top of page
Image shows the particle monitor in a London Underground platform

Mass vs number: Understanding air in your workplace

19/01/26, 18:00

Discover why PM2.5 readings alone don’t give the full picture of air quality. Learn how tracking sub-micron particle counts can reveal hidden pollution.

PM mass vs particle count: what you need to know


  • PM values: Useful for regulatory comparison

  • Particle count: Shows how many sub-micron particles are present in real time, revealing short-term fluctuations


Which channels matter


  • 0.3 µm: Indicator of sub-micron particle activity

  • 0.5 µm: Useful for tracking indoor trends

  • 1.0 µm: Reliable for indoor trend data


Use case example 1: manufacturing environments


A factory with welding or cutting operations may have PM2.5 within compliance limits. However, particle counts reveal sub-micron dust spikes during certain shifts, allowing facilities managers to prioritise additional filtration or adjust processes to reduce exposure.


Use case example 2: London Underground


The London Underground is a complex environment with high passenger numbers, frequent train movements, and variable ventilation. While PM2.5 readings might suggest air quality is acceptable, particle counts can reveal spikes in sub-micron particles on platforms, in tunnels, and in ticket halls.


Air quality teams can use this data to:


  • Identify persistent hotspots where ventilation or filtration improvements are most needed

  • Monitor real-time changes during peak passenger periods or service disruptions

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, such as new filters or air-cleaning technologies


By tracking both PM and particle numbers, transport operators can spot problem areas early, protect workers and passengers, and prioritise where high-precision equipment or filtration is needed.

bottom of page