top of page
PM-underground.jpg

Mass vs number: understanding air in your workplace

Understand the difference between PM mass and particle count in your workplace. Learn how tracking sub-micron particles reveals real-time changes in air quality.

 

See how factories, offices, and transport environments can use this data.

PM mass vs particle count: what you need to know

  • PM values: Useful for regulatory comparison

  • Particle count: Shows how many sub-micron particles are present in real time, revealing short-term fluctuations

 

Which channels matter

  • 0.3 µm: Indicator of sub-micron particle activity

  • 0.5 µm: Useful for tracking indoor trends

  • 1.0 µm: Reliable for indoor trend data

 

Use case example 1: manufacturing environments
A factory with welding or cutting operations may have PM2.5 within compliance limits. However, particle counts reveal sub-micron dust spikes during certain shifts, allowing facilities managers to prioritise additional filtration or adjust processes to reduce exposure.

 

Use case example 2: London Underground
The London Underground is a complex environment with high passenger numbers, frequent train movements, and variable ventilation. While PM2.5 readings might suggest air quality is acceptable, particle counts can reveal spikes in sub-micron particles on platforms, in tunnels, and in ticket halls.

 

Air quality teams can use this data to:

  • Identify persistent hotspots where ventilation or filtration improvements are most needed

  • Monitor real-time changes during peak passenger periods or service disruptions

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, such as new filters or air-cleaning technologies

 

By tracking both PM and particle numbers, transport operators can spot problem areas early, protect workers and passengers, and prioritise where high-precision equipment or filtration is needed.

bottom of page